MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Noah Rubin vs Samuel Groth Head to Head Stats

By Wojtek Kolan

Head-2-Head: Rubin 2 - 0 Groth

They have played 6 sets in total, with Rubin winning 4 and Groth winning 2. The last match between Rubin and Groth was at the Fairfield Challenger, 10-10-2017, First, Hard with Noah Rubin getting the victory 6-4 3-6 7-5.

Players Head-To-Head Match Wins
Noah Rubin 2
Samuel Groth 0
Rubin vs Groth H2H Profile
Rubin Stats Groth
0% (0-0) YTD Win/Loss 0% (0-0)
2 Head-to-Head 0
734 Ranking Ret.
125 Highest Rank 53
29 Age 37
R Plays R
4 Titles 11
56% (215-169) Career Total W/L 57% (387-296)
$398,175 Career Prize Money $650,305
0 YTD Titles 0
2 Hard H2H 0
0 Clay H2H 0
0 Indoor H2H 0
0 Grass H2H 0

Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)

Rubin VS Groth H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-4 3-6 7-5
cross
Noah Rubin
Player
Samuel Groth
64% ( 49 of 77)
1st Serve %
55% ( 57 of 103)
9
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
12
78% ( 38 of 49)
1st Serve Won
79% ( 45 of 57)
71% ( 20 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 24 of 46)
25% ( 2 of 8)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
25% ( 19 of 77)
Rtn Points Won
33% ( 34 of 103)
92
Total Points Won
88
6-4 4-6 7-6(6)
cross
Noah Rubin
Player
Samuel Groth
63% ( 66 of 104)
1st Serve %
58% ( 62 of 106)
3
Aces
25
0
Double Faults
9
80% ( 53 of 66)
1st Serve Won
81% ( 50 of 62)
58% ( 22 of 38)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 23 of 44)
20% ( 1 of 5)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
28% ( 29 of 104)
Rtn Points Won
31% ( 33 of 106)
108
Total Points Won
102

Rubin VS Groth H2H Stats

Rubin Vs Groth H2H Stats
Noah Rubin Rubin Stats Samuel Groth Groth
2 H2H Matches 0
4 Sets Won 2
33 Games Won 31
12 Aces (Total) 46
2 Total Double Faults 21
2:1:11 Average Match Time 2:1:11
64% (115/181) 1st Serve % 57% (119/209)
79% (91/115) 1st Serve Win % 80% (95/119)
64% (42/66) 2nd Serve Win % 52% (47/90)
23% (3/13) Break Points Won % (Total) 29% (2/7)
32% (67/209) Return Points Win % 27% (48/181)
100% (2/2) Best of 3 Sets Win % 0% (0/2)
0% (0/0) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
100% (1/1) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 0% (0/1)
100% (2/2) Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/2)
100% (2/2) 1st Set Won, Won Match 0% (0/0)
0% (2/0) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (2/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Noah Rubin vs Samuel Groth Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Rubin 2 - 0 Groth

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rubin has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Groth has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rubin, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Groth has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Rubin has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Groth has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Rubin has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Groth winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Rubin has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 59/ 43), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 113/ 92). Groth has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 69% (W/L 85/ 38), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 199/ 177).
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Rubin winning 2 times and Groth being victorious 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Rubin winning 4 and Groth winning 2. The last match between Rubin and Groth was at the Fairfield Challenger, 10-10-2017, First, Hard with Noah Rubin getting the victory 6-4 3-6 7-5.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:1:11.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Rubin and Groth have played a deciding set 2 times, with Rubin winning 2 times and Groth 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Rubin winning 1, and Groth 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rubin has played against opponents with an average rank of while Groth has played against players with an average rank of .
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rubin has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Groth has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Rubin has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Groth has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)

Noah Rubin Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R1
cross
Lukas Pokorny
Player
Noah Rubin
59% ( 45 of 76)
1st Serve %
64% ( 72 of 112)
9
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
73% ( 33 of 45)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 45 of 72)
39% ( 12 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 17 of 40)
27% ( 4 of 15)
Break Points Won
27% ( 4 of 15)
41% ( 31 of 76)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 50 of 112)
95
Total Points Won
93
L
1-6 7-6(3) 4-1 ret. H2H
R2
cross
Denis Kudla
Player
Noah Rubin
64% ( 27 of 42)
1st Serve %
57% ( 28 of 49)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
93% ( 25 of 27)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 16 of 28)
53% ( 8 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 10 of 21)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
21% ( 9 of 42)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 23 of 49)
56
Total Points Won
35
L
6-1 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Noah Rubin
Player
Matija Pecotic
60% ( 66 of 110)
1st Serve %
53% ( 56 of 105)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
64% ( 42 of 66)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 40 of 56)
50% ( 22 of 44)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 20 of 49)
46% ( 6 of 13)
Break Points Won
40% ( 4 of 10)
42% ( 46 of 110)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 45 of 105)
109
Total Points Won
106
W
5-7 6-3 7-5 H2H
QF
cross
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Noah Rubin
72% ( 46 of 64)
1st Serve %
69% ( 37 of 54)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
61% ( 28 of 46)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 21 of 37)
56% ( 10 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 7 of 17)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
50% ( 3 of 6)
41% ( 26 of 64)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 26 of 54)
64
Total Points Won
54
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Noah Rubin
Player
Peter Bertran
60% ( 33 of 55)
1st Serve %
65% ( 37 of 57)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
58% ( 19 of 33)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 21 of 37)
68% ( 15 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
35% ( 7 of 20)
45% ( 5 of 11)
Break Points Won
75% ( 3 of 4)
38% ( 21 of 55)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 29 of 57)
63
Total Points Won
49
W
6-3 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Noah Rubin
Player
Elio Jose Ribeiro Lago
67% ( 32 of 48)
1st Serve %
51% ( 25 of 49)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
72% ( 23 of 32)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 15 of 25)
69% ( 11 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 11 of 24)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
29% ( 14 of 48)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 23 of 49)
57
Total Points Won
40
W
6-3 6-2 H2H
QF
cross
James Tracy
Player
Noah Rubin
61% ( 52 of 85)
1st Serve %
78% ( 83 of 106)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
63% ( 33 of 52)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 52 of 83)
70% ( 23 of 33)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 10 of 23)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
34% ( 29 of 85)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 44 of 106)
100
Total Points Won
91
L
6-7(5) 6-4 4-2 ret. H2H
Q1
cross
Noah Rubin
Player
Kyle Kang
76% ( 39 of 51)
1st Serve %
48% ( 23 of 48)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
79% ( 31 of 39)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 14 of 23)
58% ( 7 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
56% ( 14 of 25)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
25% ( 13 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 20 of 48)
58
Total Points Won
41
W
6-3 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Joao Domingues
Player
Noah Rubin
70% ( 57 of 81)
1st Serve %
66% ( 61 of 93)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
67% ( 38 of 57)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 42 of 61)
46% ( 11 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 17 of 32)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
80% ( 4 of 5)
40% ( 32 of 81)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 34 of 93)
83
Total Points Won
91
L
6-4 1-6 7-5 H2H
QF
cross
Noah Rubin
Player
Vadym Ursu
59% ( 32 of 54)
1st Serve %
60% ( 31 of 52)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
69% ( 22 of 32)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 19 of 31)
68% ( 15 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 10 of 21)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
31% ( 17 of 54)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 23 of 52)
60
Total Points Won
46
W
6-4 6-3 H2H

Samuel Groth Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
Q1
cross
Taylor Fritz
Player
Samuel Groth
59% ( 63 of 107)
1st Serve %
53% ( 55 of 103)
9
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
7
70% ( 44 of 63)
1st Serve Won
76% ( 42 of 55)
57% ( 25 of 44)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 25 of 48)
25% ( 2 of 8)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
36% ( 38 of 107)
Rtn Points Won
35% ( 36 of 103)
105
Total Points Won
105
L
6-4 3-6 7-6(3) H2H
Q1
cross
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Samuel Groth
64% ( 42 of 66)
1st Serve %
64% ( 47 of 73)
10
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
2
81% ( 34 of 42)
1st Serve Won
83% ( 39 of 47)
75% ( 18 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 12 of 26)
25% ( 1 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
21% ( 14 of 66)
Rtn Points Won
30% ( 22 of 73)
74
Total Points Won
65
L
6-4 7-6(7) H2H
R2
cross
Jan Choinski
Player
Samuel Groth
67% ( 4 of 6)
1st Serve %
57% ( 8 of 14)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
75% ( 3 of 4)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 4 of 8)
50% ( 1 of 2)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 3 of 6)
100% ( 1 of 1)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
33% ( 2 of 6)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 7 of 14)
11
Total Points Won
9
L
2-1 ret. H2H
R1
cross
Samuel Groth
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
52% ( 29 of 56)
1st Serve %
50% ( 23 of 46)
14
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
86% ( 25 of 29)
1st Serve Won
78% ( 18 of 23)
63% ( 17 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
65% ( 15 of 23)
67% ( 2 of 3)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
25% ( 14 of 56)
Rtn Points Won
28% ( 13 of 46)
55
Total Points Won
47
W
6-3 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Noah Rubin
Player
Samuel Groth
64% ( 49 of 77)
1st Serve %
55% ( 57 of 103)
9
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
12
78% ( 38 of 49)
1st Serve Won
79% ( 45 of 57)
71% ( 20 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 24 of 46)
25% ( 2 of 8)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
25% ( 19 of 77)
Rtn Points Won
33% ( 34 of 103)
92
Total Points Won
88
L
6-4 3-6 7-5 H2H
R2
cross
Dominik Koepfer
Player
Samuel Groth
63% ( 19 of 30)
1st Serve %
46% ( 12 of 26)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
74% ( 14 of 19)
1st Serve Won
75% ( 9 of 12)
64% ( 7 of 11)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 5 of 14)
100% ( 2 of 2)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
30% ( 9 of 30)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 12 of 26)
33
Total Points Won
23
L
6-3 1-0 ret. H2H
R1
cross
Samuel Groth
Player
Manuel Sanchez
61% ( 43 of 71)
1st Serve %
69% ( 49 of 71)
13
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
84% ( 36 of 43)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 35 of 49)
50% ( 14 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 10 of 22)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
30% ( 21 of 71)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 26 of 71)
76
Total Points Won
66
W
7-5 7-5 H2H
R1
cross
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Samuel Groth
65% ( 47 of 72)
1st Serve %
52% ( 31 of 60)
0
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
64% ( 30 of 47)
1st Serve Won
74% ( 23 of 31)
60% ( 15 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 11 of 29)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
38% ( 27 of 72)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 26 of 60)
71
Total Points Won
61
L
6-4 7-5 H2H
Q1
cross
Mirza Basic
Player
Samuel Groth
63% ( 36 of 57)
1st Serve %
57% ( 38 of 67)
2
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
8
92% ( 33 of 36)
1st Serve Won
79% ( 30 of 38)
86% ( 18 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
62% ( 18 of 29)
25% ( 1 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
11% ( 6 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
28% ( 19 of 67)
70
Total Points Won
54
L
6-4 7-6(4) H2H
SF
cross
Alexander Bublik
Player
Samuel Groth
58% ( 38 of 66)
1st Serve %
62% ( 44 of 71)
8
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
6
82% ( 31 of 38)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 30 of 44)
50% ( 14 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 10 of 27)
33% ( 3 of 9)
Break Points Won
33% ( 2 of 6)
32% ( 21 of 66)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 31 of 71)
76
Total Points Won
61
L
7-6(2) 6-3 H2H

Where To Watch Rubin vs Groth?

When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Rubin Vs Groth is now available here.

banner

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Rubin & Groth Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Noah Rubin Rubin Stats Samuel Groth Groth
56% (215/169) Win/Loss 57% (387/296)
54% (484/408) Sets Win/Loss 55% (887/740)
51% (4319/4110) Games Win/Loss 51% (8565/8074)
0.26 Aces Per Game 0.62
1080 Aces Total 5047
0.23 Double Faults Per Game 0.21
940 Total Double Faults 1693
1:15:29 Average Match Time 1st Match
543.19 Average Opponent Rank 589.67
60% (13176/21888) 1st Serve % 60% (15812/26450)
68% (8955/13176) 1st Serve Win % 79% (12561/15812)
50% (4394/8712) 2nd Serve Win % 51% (5404/10636)
43% (894/2089) Break Points Won % (Total) 35% (579/1669)
39% (8443/21613) Return Points Win % 32% (8500/26231)
57% (207/363) Best of 3 Sets Win % 58% (371/643)
29% (5/17) Best of 5 Sets Win % 42% (11/26)
57% (63/110) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 53% (225/423)
57% (61/107) Deciding Set Win % 56% (136/243)
83% (218/182) 1st Set Won, Won Match 83% (373/310)
17% (218/36) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 17% (373/62)
19% (166/32) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 24% (307/73)

See recent tennis photos of Rubin and Groth

Other Predictions

Barcelona Open Banc Sabadell - Barcelona

flag
15 Apr
flag
11:00
Prediction

Barcelona Open Banc Sabadell - Barcelona

flag
15 Apr
flag
11:00
Prediction
  • Loading news...